DI 27515: Collateral Estoppel
TN 6 (08-90)
A. Policy
1. General
In most concurrent title II/title XVI claims, the disability determinations under both titles should agree.
2. When Determinations May Differ
In some concurrent claims, different determinations may be appropriate because the rules for determining disability differ or because eligibility factors are not satisfied.
Examples :
For DWB benefits payable prior to January 1991 for which was filed prior to 01/01/1991, a DWB denial and title XVI medical-vocational allowance (See DI 11015.001B.).
DIB denial after DLI and a title XVI allowance. (See DI 27515.035B.4).
B. Procedure
1. Conflicting Determinations
When there are conflicting determination/decisions:
Resolve conflicting disability determination/decisions for the same period in concurrent title II/title XVI claims under the adoption policy in DI 27515.015 A.2.
Follow DI 27520.030 for jurisdiction when resolving conflicting determinations.
Consider reopening and revision of the earlier determination (see reopening procedures in DI 27505.001ff) to resolve conflicting determinations.
2. Different Appeal Levels
Adjudicate the claim at the higher appeal level if the decisions are at different appeal levels.
3. Reopening not Possible
Perform a CDR on the conflicting decision on a post basis (see DI 27520.030ff if conflict in decisions occur).
4. Differing Determinations
If | Then... |
---|---|
unable to show medical onset before title II eligibility ends |
|
the requirements for disability differ, e.g., title II DWB vs title XVI medical /vocational decision (this example involving title II DWB is applicable only for DWB benefits payable prior to January 1991 for which applications were filed prior to 01/01/1991. (See DI 11015.001B.) |
|
title II duration requirement is not met, but SSI conversion claim State Plan continues to be met, and disability does not exist under Federal criteria. |
|
the requirement for duration is not met for title II, and title XVI is protected by 1619 provisions |
|
the requirements for title II differ, e.g., title II DWB, and statutory requirements never existed for DWB, and title XVI now ceased |
|
the title XVI disability ceased before title II duration requirement met |
|
the title XVI disability ceased more than 14 months before the title II claim is filed, and claimant is not insured for title II benefits when the title XVI claim filed |
|
work at SGA levels is protected by TWP provisions; and the duration requirement for title XVI is not met |
|
the prior title XVI denial is not subject to reopening due to time limits, but a reason to question prior denial exists, per DI 27515.015A.2. |
|
the title XVI claim is not subject to reopening because there is no new and material evidence , i.e., title II allowance is made on the basis of a “change in position” |
|
title II ceased in a concurrent title II/XVI case and title XVI is continued because of failure to realize the concurrent situation and no notice was released |
|