POMS Reference

Table of contents Recent changes
Contact
Back
This change was made on Nov 29, 2017. See latest version.
Text removed
Text added

GN 00306.285: Support Requirement Under 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) for Posthumous Child – Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe Acquiescence Rulings for Title II Child’s Benefits

changes
← * →
  • Effective Dates: 04/13/2016 - Present
  • Effective Dates: 11/29/2017 - Present
  • TN 26 (12-98)
  • TN 40 (11-17)
  • GN 00306.285 Contributions for Support Requirement for a Posthumous 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) Child
  • GN 00306.285 Support Requirement Under 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) for Posthumous Child – Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe Acquiescence Rulings for Title II Child’s Benefits
  • Citations:
  • Adams v. Weinberger, 521 F.2d 656 (2nd Cir. 1975) Parsons v. Health and Human Services, 762 F.2d 1188 (4th Cir. 1985) Doran v. Schweiker, 681 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1982) Wolfe v. Sullivan, 988 F.2nd 1025 (10th Cir. 1993)
  • Adams v. Weinberger, 521 F.2d 656 (2nd Cir. 1975), AR 86-21(2)Parsons v. Health and Human Services, 762 F.2d 1188 (4th Cir. 1985), AR 86-22(4)Doran v. Schweiker, 681 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1982), AR 86-23(9)Wolfe v. Sullivan, 988 F.2nd 1025 (10th Cir. 1993), AR 94-1(10)
  • A. Policy
  • A. Policy for the Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe acquiescence rulings (AR)
  • 1. Issue
  • Follow these instructions to apply the Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe ARs.
  • a. Adams/Parsons
  • 1. Issue in the Adams/Parsons cases
  • In these cases, the courts ruled that the proper test for determining whether the worker was contributing to the support of a posthumous child under section 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) of the Act is whether the support was commensurate with the needs of the unborn child at the time of the worker's death even though the contributions were not regular or substantial.
  • In the Adams and Parsons cases, the courts ruled that the proper test to determine whether the number holder (NH) was contributing to the support of a posthumous (not posthumously conceived) child under section 216(h)(3)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act (Act) is whether the support was commensurate with the needs of the unborn child at the time of the NH's death, even though the contributions were not regular or substantial.
  • b. Doran/Wolfe
  • 2. Issue in the Doran/Wolfe cases
  • In these cases, the proper test for contributions is the same as that applied in Adams/Parsons  except that the economic circumstances of the child's father must be considered in determining whether, at death, he was contributing to the support of the unborn child.
  • In the Doran and Wolfe cases, the courts ruled that the proper test to determine whether the NH was contributing to the support of a posthumous child is the same as applied in Adams and Parsons, except that the economic circumstances of the NH must also be considered in determining whether, at death, the NH was contributing to the support of the unborn child.
  • 2. Applicability
  • 3. Applicability of ARs
  • The Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe rulings apply at all levels. The procedures in this section apply to administrative determinations or decisions made on or after the effective date of the ruling regardless of the month of entitlement if, at the time of such determination or decision, the claimant is residing in one of the States in the pertinent circuit. The effective date for each ruling, and the circuits to which each ruling applies, are shown in the chart below.
  • Apply the Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe ARs at all levels of adjudication if, at the time of such determination or decision, the claimant is residing in one of the states in the pertinent circuits.
  • a. Adams/Parsons ARs
  • Acquiescence Ruling
  • Effective Date
  • Circuit (States)
  • Apply the Adams/Parsons ARs if the claimant’s state of residence at the time of the determination or decision is one of the states in the Second or Fourth Circuits, which include:
  • * Connecticut (Second)
  • * Maryland (Fourth)
  • * New York (Second)
  • * North Carolina (Fourth)
  • * South Carolina (Fourth)
  • * Vermont (Second)
  • * Virginia (Fourth)
  • * West Virginia (Fourth)
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • b. Doran/Wolfe ARs
  • Apply the Doran/Wolfe ARs if the claimant’s state of residence at the time of the determination or decision is in one of the states in the Ninth or Tenth Circuits, which include:
  • * Alaska (Ninth)
  • * American Samoa (Ninth)
  • * Arizona (Ninth)
  • * California (Ninth)
  • * Colorado (Tenth)
  • * Guam (Ninth)
  • * Hawaii (Ninth)
  • * Idaho (Ninth)
  • * Kansas (Tenth)
  • * Montana (Ninth)
  • * Nevada (Ninth)
  • * New Mexico (Tenth)
  • * Northern Mariana Islands (Ninth)
  • * Oklahoma (Tenth)
  • * Oregon (Ninth)
  • * Utah (Tenth)
  • * Washington (Ninth)
  • * Wyoming (Tenth)
  • 4. Deduction, termination, and nonpayment events for affected cases
  • Adams/Parsons
  • For cases affected by the Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe ARs:
  • * Do not terminate benefits paid based on applying these ARs because the beneficiary no longer resides in the Second, Fourth, Ninth, or Tenth Circuit.
  • * Apply all deduction, suspension, and nonpayment events listed in RS 00203.030 to the beneficiaries entitled under these ARs.
  • * Terminate benefits as instructed in RS 00203.035.
  • B. Field Office (FO) development and processing of cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs
  • 7/3/86
  • * Second (Connecticut, New York, or Vermont)
  • * Fourth (Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, or West Virginia)
  • Follow these instructions and the procedures in GN 00306.001D and GN 00306.001E to develop and process cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1. Development for cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs
  • Obtain satisfactory evidence establishing that the NH is the biological parent of the child and of the type of support, if any, that the NH provided during the mother's pregnancy. Support, depending on the facts of the case, may consist of relatively small cash amounts or support in kind.
  • Doran/Wolfe
  • Doran : 7/3/86
  • * Ninth (Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon, or Washington
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Wolfe: 6/27/94
  • * Tenth (Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, or Wyoming)
  • 3. Deduction, Termination and Nonpayment Events
  • * Benefits paid as a result of applying this ruling will not be terminated because the beneficiary no longer resides in the Second, Fourth, Ninth or Tenth Circuit (whichever is applicable).
  • * A child's benefits will terminate the month before the month any event in RS 00203.035 occurs.
  • * All deduction and nonpayment events in RS 00203.030 apply to beneficiaries under this ruling.
  • B. Procedure — FO- adams/parsons
  • 1. Development
  • a. Satisfactory Evidence
  • Obtain satisfactory evidence establishing that the father is the biological parent of the child.
  • b. Support
  • Obtain evidence that the NH provided some type of support during the mother's pregnancy.
  • Support, depending on the facts of the case, may consist of relatively small cash amounts or support in kind. Examples of possible support provided by the NH are:
  • Examples of possible support provided by the NH are:
  • * Transportation of the mother to the doctor's office,
  • * Doctor bills paid in relation to the pregnancy,
  • * Doctor bills paid related to the pregnancy,
  • * Payments toward the hospital bill for birth expenses, and
  • * Cash payments to the mother for food and rent.
  • c. Decision-Making
  • Weigh the contributions provided by the worker against the actual needs of the unborn child on a case-by-case basis. Prepare a special determination (RPOC, SSA-553) when the development is complete.
  • 2. Awards
  • a. MCS and CAPS Claims
  • * Process initial claims as DOFA.
  • * List all cases under code 246.
  • b. Manually Processed Claims
  • Show the remark “ Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe Acquiescence Rulings” on the routing screen/form and also in RPOC, BCRN or item 11 of the SSA-101-U3.
  • For more information on contributions for support, see RS 01301.005.
  • c. Adverse Claim
  • * Follow procedures in GN 01010.320 - GN 01010.325 for adverse claim policy.
  • * Forward the claim to the servicing PC, non-DOFA code RV 02.
  • Weigh the contributions provided by the NH against the actual needs of the unborn child on a case-by-case basis to determine if the support, even if irregular or unsubstantial, was commensurate with the unborn child’s needs.
  • 3. Disallowances
  • For special development of cases subject to the Doran/Wolfe ARs, see additional instructions in GN 00306.285B.2 in this section.
  • Enter the remark “ Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe Acquiescence Rulings - List under code 246.”
  • Prepare a special determination on a Report of Contact (RPOC) or SSA-553 in all cases. For non-MCS claims, fax the determination into the Non-Disability Repository (NDR) using the Non-Disability Repository for Evidentiary Documents (NDRed).
  • If case disallowed under code 32, follow procedures in GN 00306.001C.
  • 2. Additional instructions for developing cases subject to the Doran/Wolfe ARs
  • C. Procedures — FO- doran/wolfe
  • Consider the NH's financial circumstances, i.e. the NH’s ability to contribute, in determining whether the NH was contributing to the unborn child's support in addition to the instructions in GN 00306.285B.1 in this section.
  • In addition to the instructions set out above, take into account the NH's financial circumstances (ability to contribute) in determining whether the NH was contributing to the claimant's support.
  • Small contributions by a NH with limited financial resources constitutes support if such support meets an important part of the unborn child's needs.
  • Small contributions by a NH with limited financial resources will constitute support if an important part of the child's needs are met.
  • 3. Processing awards for cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs
  • D. Procedures — PC
  • Follow these instructions when processing awards for cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs:
  • * Enter the remark “Adams/Parsons ARs” or “Doran/Wolfe ARs,” as appropriate, on the RPOC screen in the Modernized Claims System (MCS), or the REMARKS field on the Benefit Continuity Factors/Remarks/Notice (BCRN) screen or Electronic Form BCRN (EFBCRN) screen when processing claim manually using an Automated 101 (A101) or Electronic Form 101 (EF101).
  • * Enter listing code “246” for “Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe ARs” on the Decision Input (DECI) screen in MCS.
  • * If entitlement of a child results in an adverse adjustment, follow the procedures in GN 01010.330.
  • * If entitlement of a child creates an adverse claim, follow the procedures in GN 01010.320. Forward the claim to the servicing Processing Center (PC) as a District Office Final Authorization (DOFA) exclusion (non-DOFA). Record non-DOFA reason code “3” for “ADVERSE CLM” on the Decision Input (DECI) screen in MCS. For more information on non-DOFA claims, see GN 01010.027.
  • List all cases using these procedures under listing code “246 Adams/ Parsons/Doran Acquiescence Rulings.”
  • 4. Processing disallowances for cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs
  • Follow the guidelines in GN 00306.001C. for claims disallowed under code 32.
  • Follow these instructions when processing disallowances for cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs:
  • * Before disallowing a claim, consider all options in which we might allow the child’s claim for benefits following the procedures in GN 00306.001D.
  • * If there are no such options, disallow the claim under code “32” for “Child illegitimate – no ceremonial marriage – not deemed child.” For information on documenting a code “32” disallowance, see GN 00306.001E.1.
  • * Enter the remark “Adams/Parsons AR” or “Doran/Wolfe AR,” as appropriate, on the RPOC screen in MCS.
  • * Enter listing code “246” for “Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe ARs” on the Decision Input (DECI) screen in MCS.
  • If you receive an adverse adjustment claim, see instructions in GN 01010.140 ff.
  • C. Processing Center (PC) procedures for cases subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs
  • Forward the claim to the benefit authorizer to summarize the award and, when necessary, adjust the rates to currently entitled beneficiaries. Instruct the BA to list the case under “code 246- Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe Acquiescence Rulings.”
  • Follow these procedures when processing cases in the PC that are subject to the Adams/Parsons and Doran/Wolfe ARs:
  • * List all cases adjudicated under these procedures under listing code “246” for “Adams/Parsons/Doran/Wolfe ARs.”
  • * If the claim results in an adverse adjustment, follow the procedures in GN 01010.335.
  • * If entitlement of the child creates an adverse claim, follow the procedures in GN 01010.325.
  • * After completing all actions, forward the claim to the benefit authorizer (BA) to summarize the award and, when necessary, adjust the rates to currently entitled beneficiaries. Instruct the BA to list the case under code “246.”
The materials available at this web site are provided free of charge, for informational purposes only, and without warrant by True Link Financial, Inc., and are not legal advice or Social Security benefits advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem, or the Social Security Administration with any general inquiries. Click here to view this section of the POMS on the Social Security Administration website.